[Modelinterpreter] association class?

[Mormota]

Hali!

Okay, akkor viszont ugrik az erre vonatkozo Alf support, legalabbis rovid
tavon.

Udv,
Attila

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Dévai Gergely <deva at caesar.elte.hu> wrote:

> Sziasztok!
>
> A tervezett nyelv bovebb lesz, mint az fUML. Erre a state machine a
> legjobb pelda, ami ugye szinten nincs fUML-ben...
> Kb ilyesmi: fUML + PSCS + state machine + aprosagok
>
> Gergo
>
>
> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 21:59 CET, Mormota <attila.ulbert at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hali!
>
> A wikin levo "Language features"-ben az association class mellett az van,
> hogy YES.
>
> Az fUML v1.1 szerint
>
> The following packages from the UML 2 Superstructure are excluded from the
> fUML abstract syntax.
>
>    -
>
>    AssociationClasses - Association classes, as a modeling construct, add
>    significant semantic complexity and their effect can be equivalently
>    modeled using regular classes and associations, albeit at the expense of
>    some modeling convenience. They are therefore not considered fundamental
>    for the fUML subset.
>
> Tudtok valamit a kovetelmeny hattererol? Valoban szukseg van erre?
>
> Udv,
> Attila
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Modelinterpreter mailing list
> Modelinterpreter at plc.inf.elte.hu
> https://plc.inf.elte.hu/mailman/listinfo/modelinterpreter
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://plc.inf.elte.hu/pipermail/modelinterpreter/attachments/20150227/95dc238b/attachment-0001.html>