[Modelinterpreter] association class?

Dévai Gergely deva at caesar.elte.hu
Fri Feb 27 09:25:54 CET 2015


Sziasztok!

A tervezett nyelv bovebb lesz, mint az fUML. Erre a state machine a legjobb pelda, ami ugye szinten nincs fUML-ben...
Kb ilyesmi: fUML + PSCS + state machine + aprosagok

Gergo

On Thursday, February 26, 2015 21:59 CET, Mormota <attila.ulbert at gmail.com> wrote:
 Hali! A wikin levo "Language features"-ben az association class mellett az van, hogy YES. Az fUML v1.1 szerint
The following packages from the UML 2 Superstructure are excluded from the fUML abstract syntax. 
 * 
AssociationClasses - Association classes, as a modeling construct, add significant semantic complexity and their effect can be equivalently modeled using regular classes and associations, albeit at the expense of some modeling convenience. They are therefore not considered fundamental for the fUML subset. Tudtok valamit a kovetelmeny hattererol? Valoban szukseg van erre? Udv,Attila


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://plc.inf.elte.hu/pipermail/modelinterpreter/attachments/20150227/891d4cdc/attachment.html>


More information about the Modelinterpreter mailing list